Saturday, February 5, 2022

A Case for Perspective in the Art and Entertainment Industry

The fields of art and entertainment would be barren without freedom of expression.


 

However, when marginalised communities, especially Dalits ‘attempt’ to exercise this freedom, even in form of basic human entitlements (like wearing footwear, riding a horse, or sporting a moustache), they have to face negative comments, abuses and even violent attacks. One may recall in 2015, a Dalit man Sagar Shejwal was beaten to death by eight ‘upper’ caste assailants in Shirdi, Maharashtra, because his mobile’s ringtone praised Ambedkar.

The Dalit-Bahujan quest to participate in the entertainment world has often been neglected or looked down on.

In the recent past, learning from the Black arts movement in Hollywood, there have been promising attempts to democratise the Indian film and entertainment industry. With new bold artistic films by Pa Ranjith, Nagaraj Manjule, Vetrimaran, among others, a dialogue has been initiated claiming new space for the Dalit-Bahujan filmmakers in the industry.

Further, with the arrival of the recent short video app ‘Jai Bheem’, one can see that the quest of the artistes and performers belonging to the socially marginalised groups to become an influential part of the entertainment industry with more visibility. These attempts have introduced the ideas of social justice to the cinema and entertainment industry and can be a step forward towards its greater democratisation.

Ambedkar and freedom of expression

The Dalit-Bahujan masses revere Babasaheb Ambedkar as the crucial source of inspiration, who help us understand how we shall operate in the modern world as free and equal beings, capable enough to take independent and rational decisions for our wellbeing.

Today, if Ambedkar sees that people belonging to Dalit-Bahujan sections are so diversely talented in various spheres of arts, dance, music, acting, performances and wanted to create their own name in these fields, what would be his advice to such creative people?

What will be his views on Dalit’s participation in the domain of mass entertainment? Will he be happy to see films like Fandry, Sairat, Kala, Asuran and Jai Bhim? Do we have an Ambedkarite framework to understand how the film industry, which is a crucial source shapes our cultural politics and impacts the social psyche?

Ambedkar, as a vocal proponent of democratic participation of the deprived sections in public life, would suggest that each sphere of social and economic life shall be diverse, ensuring substantive participation of different segments of society. In this respect, the entertainment industry needs diversity and participation of the Dalit-Bahujan groups.

 

Further, Ambedkar, as the sincere proponent of freedom of expression, would suggest that artistes should be unshackled from social prejudice, dogmas and elite control. According to him, an artiste can perform, with the best of their abilities, only if they have no coercive restrictions to comply with. This is because freedom would be so dear to Ambedkar that he would tell an artiste to create a society that respects individual dreams, cherishes freedom and contests each form of social injustices to build harmonious social environment.

After many historic socio-political struggles, a small but conscious and vocal Dalit middle-class segment is present in the public sphere today. However, a vast Dalit population, anticipating coercive opposition, lives in fear and remains submissive.

Especially, in the entertainment world, there are very few artistes and technicians who can proudly refer to their ‘Shudhra/Bahujan’ or ‘Dalit’ ancestry. For example, the legendary lyricist Shailendra never revealed his ‘Dalit’ identity, whereas actor Raj Kapoor had always worn his Punjabi cultural and social capital on his sleeve. The values of the Brahmanical system hegemonises our social outlook and forces our minds to look down on the Dalit-Bahujan identities with shame and prejudices. Therefore, the Dalit-Bahujan artistes are often prisoners of such stereotypes.

Further, the entertainment business, especially the film-making segment, is one of the most expensive mediums, as it attracts grand fame, money and power. Therefore, the doors of this business are often closed for ‘outsiders’. The sector is dominated by close-knit social networks, nepotism and class associations. Especially, for the Dalit-Bahujan communities, getting a fair and dignified entry in this segment is a difficult task.

There are many gatekeepers who often disallow or discourage talented artistes from having a fair entry into the business. The film industry often promotes the cultural ideas and socio-political concerns of the social elites and relegates the Dalit-Bahujan artistes to be mere insignificant passive spectators. Their art, creativity and cultural symbols find no recognisable space within the mainstream entertainment industry.

The world of entertainment significantly changed with the arrival of many short video mobile applications. Earlier Tiktok had allowed diverse people living in smaller towns and rural areas, especially the artists belonging to the lower social and class strata, to become part of the entertainment world.

The participation of Dalit-Bahujan artistes as the creators and consumers of entertaining content has not only diversified the entertainment segment but also showcased the deep desires of the artistes belonging to the marginalised groups to showcase their talent.

However, after the ban on Tiktok in India, many alternatives emerged in its place but hardly have a similar impact. Other applications like Instagram reels or YouTube shorts, mainly serve the entertainment values of the middle-class elites, disallow the Dalit-Bahujan artistes to take the centerstage.  Though these popular technological innovations in the social media space allow the participation of the Dalit-Bahujan artistes, it has often been observed they restrict and relegate the creative content of the Dalit-Bahujan artistes. They claim such content “violates community standards”, stopping them from taking centre stage either by tagging them as “inappropriate content”, or by trolling them with abuses and casteist slurs.

Watch Spider-Man No Way Home Online
Watch Uncharted Online
Watch Moonfall Online
Watch Scream Online
Watch Sing 2 Online
Watch The Black Phone Online
Watch Morbius Online
Watch Hotel Transylvania 4 Online

Recall the controversy stoked by troll armies when Jack Dorsey, the CEO (chief executive officer) of Twitter held a poster with “Smash Brahmanical Patriarchy” written on it.  The traditional entertainment platforms have several times restricted, relegated and erased the creative content of the Dalit-Bahujan artistes, and their attempts to take centre stage on the internet have also been curtailed often. One must also note that the algorithms of these apps often promote so-called ‘good looking faces’, mainstream music and commercialised content. Therefore, the Dalit-Bahujan entries – like songs on Buddha and Ambedkar, dances and skits by Dalit artistes, news content on caste atrocities, among others – are often relegated to the background, and do not show up prominently on these platforms.

Source Link Here: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls089130599/

 

 

Disqus for revathskumar